Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Top 10 Barack Obama Revelations

1. Barack Obama: The Fresh Prince of Washington, The Answer To All of Our Problems.
After eight years under the George Bush administration many Americans were ready for a change in their government, things were looking pretty grim and the world of politics was somewhat uninspired. Enter Obama with cries of "hope" and "change" and exactly what everyone wanted to hear, and the answer to all of our problems....supposedly.


Image: http://www.djztrip.com/obama/

A young, fresh face on the political stage to swoop in and save us from the "terrors" of the last eight years. Obama rose to super-stardom quickly especially among the youth of America. According to Paul Street in Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics "In the place of bitterness, cronyism, and dysfunctional political warfare he promises to restore "hope" with a practical "get things done" approach to policy and a therapeutic sense of "unity" binding Americans in a "common destiny and dream"." Obama's use of what I would call "buzz" words was extremely well executed during his campaign. By repeating and constantly using words like hope, unity, dream, and change Obama was able to focus and mesmerize voters because these are the words they wanted to hear. This helped to raise Obama up on a pedestal that could not possibly be stable for too long. Obama used his fresh new face to reel the voters in with fancy language and exciting speeches, finding a way to appeal to everyone. The question of whether or not he could deliver was rarely asked by voters.


2. Obama accepted Big Money after making big promises not too.
During his campaign Obama made a big deal about not accepting money from corporate lobbyists or PACS. Even going so far as to challenge Hilary Clinton to do the same. Obama claimed to rely mainly on small donations from ordinary working people (Street 14). However by this time he had already raised millions and was still accepting money from contributors such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley. Some of these contributors were also involved in the sub prime mortgage crisis while providing Obama with more than $100 million before the primary season (Street 14).



CBS New Reports exposing Obama's campaign financing and where all of the money is really coming from.

Chicago Sun Times columnist Lynn Sweet found that Obama was relying heavily on wealthy and well connected Democrats. Apparently there is something called a "bundler" which is described by Sweet as "people who solicit their networks for donations". According to Sweet Obama had 138 "bundlers" who each pledged to raise at least $50,000 which most of them were able to deliver. Here is a copy of Sweet's article which goes more into who these "bundlers were. According to Street Obama relied on big money donations for his senate campaigns as well, raising 5 million dollars from just 300 donors just for the primary election. Obama also received a large donation from James S. Crown who holds a large stake in General Dynamics, during his U.S. Senate campaign (Street 15). My mom always said "once a cheater, always a cheater" I think she was referring to men, but I think it applies to politics too.

3. The Media Made Obama
During the 2008 election Obama definitely dominated the media. Everywhere you looked during the campaign Obama was there, on television, radio, and online. The majority of things you heard through the mainstream media about Obama were also positive. While everyone was ragging on Hilary because of some poor wardrobe choices Obama could do nothing to make the media turn against him.

Image: http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/10/obama_and_the_m_1.php

Today the mainstream media is how most people get their information, and unfortunately most people believe everything they hear. The mainstream media has an incredible power over the American people which is why the media was so successful in making Obama so popular. In Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics Paul Street says "Among the leading media outlets that gave Obama fawning cover-page publicity during his time in the U.S. Senate and on the presidential campaign trail over the past three years were Time, Newsweek, GQ, Men's Vogue, Marie Claire, Washington Life, and Vibe (Street xix).
Image: http://www.msdelaleu.com/blog/?cat=83

Literally everywhere you looked there was Obama. In an article titled "Study: Media Coverage Has Favored Obama Campaign" by David Bauder published in the October 31st 2008 edition of the Huffington Post, George Mason University Professor and head of the Center for Media and Public Affairs, Robert Lichter was quoted as saying ""For whatever reason, the media are portraying Barack Obama as a better choice for president than John McCain, If you watch the evening news, you'd think you should vote for Obama."

4. Using Social Media will get you elected as President
The 2008 Presidential election had a lot of firsts, obviously we elected our countries first black president. One of the other firsts in the election was the use of the internet and social media during campaigning. During the campaign the Obama camp harnessed well known and popularly used social network applications to help them build a strong and engaged following.

Image: http://adlandcreative.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/social-media-2009-obama/

By using the internet to campaign Obama was able to reach the public without paying millions of dollars to the media networks to get on their airwaves. Not only was it costing him less but he was also reaching a fully engaged audience who chose to watch his materials online. He created his own Youtube channel where he could post as many videos as he wanted. In David Carr's article How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks' Power he quotes lawyer and money manager Ranjit Mathoda saying “ Thomas Jefferson used newspapers to win the presidency, F.D.R. used radio to change the way he governed, J.F.K. was the first president to understand television, and Howard Dean saw the value of the Web for raising money. But Senator Barack Obama understood that you could use the Web to lower the cost of building a political brand, create a sense of connection and engagement, and dispense with the command and control method of governing to allow people to self-organize to do the work.”

Here is a video of Joe Trippi a well known political strategist on the use of new media in the 2008 campaigns.


Understanding the use of social media was an important part of Obama's campaign. The authors of Media and Society David Croteau & William Hoynes comment on the use of technologies and media. "Media technologies can be powerful social forces; their power lies in the ways they help organize and allow us to construct the cultural environment"(Croteau & Hoynes 307). This is exactly how Obama addressed the media, particularly social media and is one of the reasons his campaign was so successful.

5. "So what does Obama really stand for? Who cares he's attractive!" Many young voters voted blindly in 2008.
We live in an image driven world. A shift that happened originally with the creation of television and has continued to evolve with the internet. Image is important to people in today's world and is what many base assumptions on. Television commercials have become an expensive and "required" part of political campaigns. It is an easy, but expensive way to reach a lot of inattentive people and to shape their idea of what you are all about. It is also a way to turn yourself into a celebrity.



While Paul Street was interviewing students from the University of Iowa about the primaries in 2007 these are some of the responses he got from students about why they were voting for Obama. "Oh, he's just so cool. He's on television all the time and he's just really excellent. Nobody ever heard of him before and then boom - there he is, like...I can listen to him all day." and "He's really handsome" (Street 168). Obama became more of a celebrity than a politician during his campaigns and young voters who have grown up in an image driven celebrity ruled world found his celebrity status easier to connect with then actually looking at Obama and the other politicians and the issues that they stood for. Neil Postman the author of Amusing Ourselves to Death would argue that this is because of the shift our society has gone through from type to image. In his book Postman says "The media of communication available to a culture are a dominant influence on the formation of the culture's intellectual and social preoccupations" (Postman 9). The way in which presidential candidates today campaign today is much different from how it was originally done in the past. Candidates use 30 second television commercials to try and capture the attention of an overstimulated audience and to try and convince them that they are the right candidate.


image: http://kara.allthingsd.com/20081103/john-mccain-and-barack-obama-talk-tech/

It helps of course if that candidate is attractive and stands out, which was certainly the case with Obama. Not only was he a black candidate but he was young, fresh, and attractive looking to many people compared to John McCain who was obviously an older looking, less fresh and attractive man. Obama was a success in our image driven world because he was the preferred image that American voters wanted to see, it doesn't matter what his politics really are, he sounds good in his 30 second commercials and he sure looks good!


6. He's the first black President, but he's not that black.
President Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States of America. Our countries history with racism and struggle for black equality makes the election of Barack Obama as President an historical event. Even though he is black, Barack Obama does not follow in the footsteps of past presidential candidates Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who are quite loud, and what some would call radical.

Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton Image:http://thesmugger.com/?p=996

According to Paul Street "Many whites who roll their eyes at the mention of the names of Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton - former presidential candidates who behave in ways many whites find too African American - are calmed and "impressed" by the cool, underplayed blackness and ponderous quasi-academic tone of the half-white, Harvard educated Obama. Obama doesn't shout, chant, holler, or drawl. He doesn't rail against injustice, bring the parishioners to their feet, or threaten delicate white suburban and middle-class sensibilities" (Street 82). Obama was able to find a balance in order to appeal to the masses who would elect him as president whether black or white.



7. Obamacare: Easier said than done.
One of the most drastic things that Obama has done since his election is to present a bill for health care reform, to create a national health care system for the United States. Currently health care laws are legally controlled by state and are often extremely complicated. Health care costs are through the roof and many Americans are uninsured, preventing them from seeking any kind of health care because there is no way they can afford it.


Image: http://hummersandcigarettes.blogspot.com/2010/07/obamacare-s-rolls-downhill-begins.html

According to Steffie Wollhandler, MD in the American Journal of Public Health "being uninsured raises the odds of dying by 40%. Hence, lack of health insurance causes 44,798 deaths each year among the 46 million uninsured Americans" (Censored 40). It is easy to understand why a national health care system which would cover all Americans would be a positive change, it would help stop these unnecessary deaths and would improve the health of our country. However it is not that easy, and there is a lot of doubt about how effective the new health care system would really be. According to Dr. David Himmelstein, associate professor of medicine at Harvard "These unnecessary deaths will continue under the new health care reform legislation. The Bill would do virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013, and leave at least 17 million uninsured in the long run" (Censored 39).

Image: http://liberalbaptistrev.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/insurancecare-and-obamacare/

Obama's health care reform plan may sound like extremely positive change for our country at first but there are a lot of details that need to be considered when you are changing such an important industry so drastically. There is also still a lot of doubt from many Americans about the governments ability to run the health care system, and whether or not we really want to put our health into their hands.


8. Obama tackles cyberspace.
In a world full of constantly changing technology it is hard to keep up. There are so many ways to communicate with people all over the world that our world has in a sense shrunk. Until now there has not been much control over the internet. There is no "gatekeeper" to decide what is appropriate to be published on the internet. It has been a free space for people all over the world to upload and download whatever information they want. The idea of cyber surveillance first came about during the Bush Administration in response to the attacks on 9/11. Obama is taking the idea of surveillance to a whole new level, giving himself almost complete control of the internet. In 2009 Senate Bill 773, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 was proposed. "This act gives the president power to "declare a cyber security emergency" with respect to private computer networks, and to do with these networks what it deems necessary to diffuse the attack. In a national emergency, the president would also have the power to completely shut down the internet in the US" (Censored 26).



In April of 2009 the Obama administration also invoked the "states secret privilege" to keep American from suing the government for spying on them illegally (Censored 27). We have shifted from a world of privacy to a world of surveillance, nothing that is done on the internet is private from anyone, especially the government. From the looks of it Obama is slowly setting himself up to become the "gatekeeper" of the internet, with the ability to shut it all down just by touching the big red button.



9. Guantanamo Bay - Still open for business.
On January 22nd 2009 brand new President Obama issued an executive order to have Guantanamo closed within a year. Along with the closing Obama called for a review of the status of prisoners held there which required standards of treatment in accordance with the Geneva convention.



Here we are, about to enter 2011 and Guantanamo Bay is still open. In fact since Obama has been elected violence towards prisoners appears to have increased at Guantanamo. According to Ahmed Ghappour a Guantanamo lawyer his clients have reported an increase in abuse since the election of Obama, and his announcement about closing the facility (Censored 126). Obama's announcement to close Guantanamo came only days after his inauguration. It seemed like an ambitious goal, and has proved to be more difficult then Obama must have projected when he promised to close Guantanamo a year ago.



The peoples expectations of Obama were so big when he was elected it felt like he was trying to live up to them by attempting to do something drastic within the first half of his presidency. In our media driven world people crave drama and excitement, there was certainly a lot of excitement when Obama was elected, and he fueled the fire by making all sorts of promises, unfortunately the excitement seems to have died down so what will happen next? Perhaps in the future there should be more planning before big promises like the closing of Guantanamo are made.


10. The Obamas: The American Dream
Neil Postman, author of "Amusing Ourselves to Death Public Discourse in The Age of Show Business" believes that we are in the "decline of the Age of Typography and the ascendancy of the Age of Television" (Postman 8). Our society is changing, being consumed by the world of the image and fast paced world of television. "This change-over has dramatically and irreversibly shifted the content and meaning of public discourse, since two media so vastly different cannot accommodate the same ideas. As the influence of print wanes, the content of politics, religion, education, and anything else that comprises public business must change and be recast in terms that are most suitable to television" (Postman 8).


Image: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/children_shealth/4431014/Too-much-television-can-make-children-mentally-ill.html

Our world is changing quickly around us. Technology is changing, our way of life and social norms are changing, and I think that in a way people are looking for a way to stabilize our fast paced and quickly changing world. As I watched the election results in November of 2008, and watched the Obama family come out on stage once the announcement had been made, it struck me that they looked like a typical American family, living the typical "American Dream". Two parents, and two little girls who received a puppy upon moving into the White House, what could be more normal then that?

Image: http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/droolicious/archive/tags/dress/default.aspx?PageIndex=2

It has been several administrations since there were young children and a completely stable normal family in the White House. I think that our "change-over" to a society dominated by television may have picked up on this somewhere along the line. In a time when many are struggling due to a poor economy and unstable times it is only natural to look for inspiration in our leaders. I think seeing the Obama family living the "American Dream" is one of the reasons why he was so likable to so many people during his campaign.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Senior Class GIft Video Project

A short video my classmates and I created to promote giving to the Senior Class Gift. Yes...I am in the Beaver costume.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Daddy Got a DROID...Media Meditation #5

The other day, as I often do, I stopped into my dads office in Burlington to say a quick hello. I walked into his office, sat down across from his desk and watched him as he typed an e-mail.
I'm still not sure how he hasn't completely destroyed several keyboards by now. He types with two fingers, and with way more force then is possibly needed. You can hear him typing from the lobby of his office. I never think of my father as being a master of technology, he approaches his computer like its the wood pile, and when there is not a simple solution, or something weird happens he either panics or gets mad.

When he had finished bruising his keyboard he turned to me and said "look what I got today." As he reached into his pocket I was expecting him to pull out a new flavor of Fisherman's Friends that he had discovered. We both eat the Cherry flavored ones like candy, cough or no cough.


Photo: http://boards.ign.com/wwe_smackdown/b6546/183276559/r183315044/


Instead Daddy pulled out a DROID. I was shocked. Last year my dad had a brief relationship with a Blackberry Storm before he traded it for the cheapest simplest phone he could possibly find. "Do you know how to work that thing?" I asked, skeptical of his abilities to use this convergent piece of technology. My dad gave me the stop being a smart-ass look, and I watched as he stared at his new DROID in a mixture of wonder and terror.



I always forget that my parents generation didn't grow up with all this new technology around them. We have grown up with computers and our ability to use them has evolved along with the constantly changing technology. All of this is new to people in my parents generation, and using this technology doesn't come as natural to them as it does to us. I always have to stop and think about this before I get frustrated with one of my parents while I am trying to show them how to do something on the computer.


I decided to give my dad the benefit of the doubt, maybe he really did know how to work this piece of technology. No sooner had the thought entered my mind when he asked me how to put the "damn thing on vibrate."

What now? To blog or not to blog.

So far this blog has been used solely for the purpose of "mediating on my media" for my Contemporary Media Issues class. (#ccm315 if you would ever like to see what we are talking about on Twitter...yes we Tweet in class.) Since we Champlainers have proven ourselves to be sensational bloggers we are no longer required to blog for class. I was sad to hear this announcement because I have developed a liking for this blogging. So I think I will continue with "Where's the Craic" as it has provided me with a unique place to express my opinions...whether you want to hear them or not.

So onward I blog.



Photo: http://designyoutrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/5_131_main.jpeg


I found this photo today while Stumbling...I'm not sure exactly what it means, perhaps an artistic take on "Little Red Riding Hood". I thought it was an interesting piece of work and thought I would share it. Enjoy.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Media Meditation #4: "22 and NOT Pregnant....Where is That Show MTV?" - Casey Norton

Recently while browsing the channels on a rainy day, my roommate Casey and I were shocked at the line up on MTV for that exciting evening.


MTV Logo: http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2009/03/the-converging-of-cultures-mtv-and-youtube-part-one.html

The Line up was as follows:

7:00 pm: Baby High (the newest baby momma show)

MTV's Baby High: http://www.examiner.com/sex-education-in-national/mtv-tackles-teen-pregnancy-and-parenting-with-baby-high-and-new-season-of-teen-mom-video
8:00 pm: Teen Mom (season 2)

MTV's Teen Mom: http://www.momblognetwork.com/pregnancy/teen-mom-season-2-continues-tonight-last-week-s-recap

10:00 Pm: 16 and Pregnant

MTV's 16 and Pregnant: http://www.examiner.com/sex-relationships-in-tampa-bay/16-pregnant-reality-documentary-or-shortcut-to-fame

Here is a trailer from the latest season of Teen Mom...which follows the same girls from the last season of 16 and Pregnant.




"What the hell" I said out loud "Whats up with all the baby momma shows?"
"I know for real! I'm 22 and NOT pregnant...where's my show MTV?" replied Casey in a frustrated tone.

After I finished laughing at her outburst, I thought about it. What is the obsession with Teen Pregnancy? And why are there so many shows about it on TV? Not just on MTV, but everywhere. Lifetime movies like "The Pregnancy Pact" and ABC Families "Secret Life of The American Teenager" are all shows about Teen Pregnancy targeted at young high school age girls. Isn't this the audience we are trying to prevent from getting pregnant? Is bombarding these girls with TV shows about teen pregnancy sending a mixed message?

I would not say the shows are necessarily glamorizing teen pregnancy, as can be seen in this clip from the latest season of Teen Mom.



I am sure that there are plenty of girls who watch these teen pregnancy shows and it makes them more cautions about getting pregnant which is a positive aspect of the show. At the same time I think there are many girls who watch these shows and think that if they get pregnant they are going to get this kind of attention. Not only from the media but from the rest of the people in their lives as well. This type of thinking is being breed into the minds of our generation with all of these reality TV shows. If you do something enough you will get on TV.


The Cast of MTV's Jersey Shore: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/12/09/jersey-shore-sparks-controversy/


I think that TV channels that target young teen audiences have to be careful about what messages they are sending to all teens. Teens do not think clearly, I know, I spent the the entire year I was 15 grounded for doing stupid stuff. After reading the fourth chapter of Censored 2011 which talks about positive news stories not highlighted in the everyday news, I think that MTV and other networks that are popular with teens should spend more time creating programs that will inspire teens to do good things for themselves and other people.

Also maybe these teen mommy shows should have a warning similar to the one that they show at the beginning of every Jack Ass show...


Jack Ass WARNING :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jackass-title.jpg

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Project Censored: #4 ICE Operates Secret Detention Centers and Courts

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Badge. Photo: www.ice.gov



Facts from 2011 Censored Text
1. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are holding thousands of immigrants in unlisted unmarked subfield offices and deporting them in secret court hearings.
2. Ice has created a network of secret jails across the country for holding individual immigrants in transit.
3. These unmarked offices often lack basic amenities such as showers, beds, drinking water, soap, even attorneys and legal information.
4. Immigrants can be transferred away from their attorneys at any point, and are often “lost” from their attorneys and families for weeks at a time.
5. ICE agents often impersonate civilians – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) inspectors, insurance agents, and religious workers to arrest Immigrants that are under suspicion even though they have no criminal history.
6. Anyone entering the immigration courts in Eloy Arizona must submit a request in writing two weeks in advance their name, date of birth, Social Security number, home address, and the hearing they wish to attend.
7. Anyone with a felony or misdemeanor conviction in the last five years can be prohibited to attend hearings for security reasons.
8. The majority of these jails are under the control of local and state governments that are subcontracted with ICE.


Is this really a censored story?
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement has several fully operating facilities in which illegal immigrants are held before their deportation hearings. These ICE detention centers, are government regulated and are run much like prisons. Here is a video that gives an example of what one of these detention centers is like and how it is run.




These are the immigrant detention centers that we hear about in the media. They are government run. While searching for articles about the network of secret underground jails that are run by state and local police but subcontracted by ICE, I mostly found articles about how ICE is working on reconstructing their official detention centers and the way in which illegal immigrants are captured, processed, and deported.

This is an example of an article from the Washington Post that talks about how ICE is working on fixing all of the negative associations people have with them by improving their detention centers and the way in which they function.

The Washington Post

May 20, 2008 Tuesday

Regional Edition

Caring for Immigration Detainees

BYLINE: Julie L. Myers

SECTION: EDITORIAL COPY; Pg. A13

LENGTH: 871 words

Recent media reports, including a May 11-14 Post series, have presented a misleading view of the medical care provided to detainees at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities. Readers deserve to hear from both sides.

ICE was formed in March 2003 with a broad mission that includes immigration and customs enforcement and management of the detention and removal processes for apprehended aliens. ICE did not create the detention or detainee health-care systems but, in fact, inherited the procedures of the former Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Division of Immigration Health Services (DIHS). Over the past 2 1/2 years, ICE has examined these decades-old practices and is making substantial improvements.

As the number of people in ICE custody has risen, demand for health care and medical services has also grown significantly. Unfortunately, many reports neglected to mention ICE's efforts to improve care at detention facilities. Some, including recent New York Times reports, focused on stories that predate these efforts.

DIHS provides medical care for routine as well as life-threatening conditions, including kidney disease, high-risk pregnancy, HIV-AIDS, hypertension and diabetes. Each detainee is medically screened upon arrival. Last year, preexisting chronic conditions were diagnosed and initially treated in 34 percent of detainees. In many cases, this marks the first time that detainees, who often do not have medical insurance, learn of their own conditions. ICE detention standards call for physical exams, sick-call visits and prescription drugs as ordered by medical providers.

The Post series focused on deaths known to have occurred at ICE detention facilities. To be clear: Any death that occurs in detention is regrettable. ICE spent nearly $100 million last year for detainee health care, double the funding of just five years ago. Our efforts are producing results.

While the number of people in ICE detention has increased more than 30 percent since 2004, the first full year for which statistics under the agency are available, the mortality rate has declined every year. In 2004, the mortality rate for ICE detainees was 10.8 per 100,000. In 2007, it was 3.5 per 100,000. The number of deaths in detention has decreased, from 29 in 2004 to seven in 2007.

ICE detainees have access to mental health care provided by qualified professionals, and staff working with detainees receive ongoing training in suicide risk and prevention techniques. Psychologists and social workers have managed a daily population of more than 1,350 seriously mentally ill detainees without a single suicide being committed in the past 15 months.

ICE has increased oversight and accountability at all its detention facilities. Progress includes establishing an independent body to review detention inspections; implementing national detention standards that are comparable to or surpass industry standards in their commitment to detainee health and comfort; retaining full-time quality assurance professionals to assess compliance with those standards; and contracting independent corrections and detention experts to audit ICE facilities. Moreover, ICE detention facilities are open to those outside the agency: We routinely conduct tours for members of Congress, representatives from nongovernmental organizations and the media.

Working with the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Health Affairs, ICE is also improving operations at DIHS, which, as the designated medical authority for ICE, is responsible for detainee health care. Since DIHS came under ICE's authority last October, a number of improvements have been implemented, and others are underway, including: selecting a new DIHS director, streamlining the hiring process to address staff shortages and moving to an enhanced electronic medical records system. We are reviewing ways to improve the treatment-authorization process. All of these steps will help enhance the quality of care and DIHS responsiveness to detainee needs. As we continue working to strengthen the detainee medical health system, we will seek recommendations from our own DHS inspector general, nongovernmental organizations and Congress, among others.

A May 14 Post article and headline said that detainees are "drugged" without medical reason, implying that involuntary sedation for deportation is routine practice. Last June, ICE enacted a policy requiring a court order before any involuntary sedation could take place, except in emergency circumstances where the detainee actively poses a threat to himself or another. In January that policy was strengthened to prohibit involuntary sedation for the purpose of facilitating a removal without a court order -- no exceptions.

Readers should know that ICE does not tolerate malfeasance or malpractice. Instances of improper behavior will be immediately and vigorously investigated; if necessary, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken.

The detention of individuals in immigration removal proceedings understandably raises strong opinions and concerns among Americans. Your readers deserve a balanced view.

The writer is assistant secretary of homeland security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

LOAD-DATE: May 20, 2008

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

DISTRIBUTION: Maryland

PUBLICATION-TYPE: Newspaper

Copyright 2008 The Washington Post

All Rights Reserved




This article is mainly talking about the ICE detention centers that are officially run by ICE itself. There is a whole network of other detention centers that contract with ICE, but are generally run by ex-ICE employees who are now working for a state or local government. These are the centers that need to be fixed, and are the ones that are getting away with the inhumane treatment of detained immigrants. This article from the New York Times talks about how the US government has neglected to change anything in the detention system yet.



The New York Times

July 29, 2009 Wednesday

Late Edition - Final

U.S. Rejects Changes in Detainee Rules

BYLINE: By NINA BERNSTEIN

SECTION: Section A; Column 0; Metropolitan Desk; Pg. 17

LENGTH: 1001 words

The Obama administration has refused to make legally enforceable rules for immigration detention, rejecting a federal court petition by former detainees and their advocates and embracing a Bush-era inspection system that relies in part on private contractors.

The decision, contained in a six-page letter received by the plaintiffs this week, disappointed and angered immigration advocacy organizations around the country. They pointed to a stream of newly available documents that underscore the government's failure to enforce minimum standards it set in 2000, including those concerning detainees' access to basic health care, telephones and lawyers, even as the number of people detained has soared to more than 400,000 a year.

The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the immigration detention system, a conglomeration of county jails, federal centers and privately run prisons, concluded ''that rule-making would be laborious, time-consuming and less flexible'' than the review process now in place, Jane Holl Lute, the agency's deputy secretary, said in the letter.

The department maintained that current inspections by the government, and a shift in 2008 to ''performance-based standards'' monitored by private contractors, ''provide adequately for both quality control and accountability.''

The administration's letter met a 30-day deadline set by Judge Denny Chin of Federal District Court in Manhattan. Judge Chin ruled last month that the agency's failure to respond to the plaintiffs' petition for two and a half years was unreasonable.

The government's decision ''disregards the plight of the hundreds of thousands of immigration detainees,'' said Paromita Shah, associate director of the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, one of the plaintiffs, which contends that the lack of enforceable rules is at the heart of persistent problems of mistreatment and medical neglect. ''The department has demonstrated a disturbing commitment to policies that have cost dozens of lives.''

The plaintiffs had expected better from the Obama administration, said Dan Kesselbrenner, the project's director.

But Matt Chandler, a spokesman for Homeland Security who served in the Obama campaign, put a different face on the rejection of rule-making.

''The rule-making process can take months, if not years,'' he said in an e-mailed statement, ''and the administration believes that reforming our immigration detention system needs to happen much faster than that.'' A special adviser on detention to Janet Napolitano, the secretary of homeland security, ''is engaged in a top-to-bottom review'' of the detention system, he said, and will release her recommendations soon.

In a telephone interview, the adviser, Dora Schriro, said Immigration and Customs Enforcement had made changes in recent years ''in an effort toward continuous improvement.''

''What's appreciably different about this administration is the recognition that detention and alternatives to detention are disciplines, and can and will be carried out under the most professional of standards,'' Dr. Schriro said.

But standards without teeth are doomed to fail, said lawyers for two other national immigration law organizations, one in Los Angeles and another in Chicago, echoing the plaintiffs' disappointment with the rejection of enforceable rules.

Both groups recently won the release of thousands of pages of detention inspection documents that had been kept secret. They said the documents showed that the government had routinely violated its own minimum monitoring standards and ignored findings of deficiencies for years.

The ''performance-based'' standards the Obama administration has now embraced have no penalties and are not significantly different from what failed in the past, said Karen Tumlin, a lawyer with the National Immigration Law Center in California. On Tuesday, the center issued what it called ''the first nationwide comprehensive report'' on violations of detention standards, based on records from 2004 and 2005 obtained through Freedom of Information litigation.

Dozens of more recent inspection documents, some from this year, show a similar pattern, said Chuck Roth, the director of litigation for the Chicago group, Heartland Alliance's National Immigration Justice Center. Many were posted by the government itself on the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Web site after the center won a three-year federal court battle to force their release.

''The groups that ICE commonly contracts with are staffed by former ICE employees and former corrections officers who have a vested interest in pleasing ICE,'' Mr. Roth said, ''so we haven't seen them take the useful watchdog role.''

The documents include eight years of monitoring reports by the American Bar Association, which has been granted access to detention centers and detainees only on condition that its findings, shared with the government, are not made public.

Reports from two bar association visits to the Elizabeth Detention Center in Elizabeth, N.J., in January 2006 and July 2007, illustrate the weaknesses. In 2006, the team noted detainee complaints about medical neglect and threats of physical violence that were reported to guards but ignored.

A year and a half later, a return visit was cut by the center to two hours from six hours, and ''inexplicably, many of the areas that the delegation had requested to visit in advance and needed to see in order to fulfill its mission were locked'' and off limits.

The delegation was unaware that only two months earlier a 52-year-old tailor named Boubacar Bah had died after suffering a skull fracture in the jail and being locked in an isolation cell without treatment for more than 13 hours.

''This whole detention system that has been created is a human rights nightmare,'' said Mary Meg McCarthy, executive director of the National Immigrant Justice Center. ''The past administration created this, and now we need to dismantle it.''

URL: http://www.nytimes.com

LOAD-DATE: July 29, 2009

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

PUBLICATION-TYPE: Newspaper

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company


The media is aware of the way immigrants are being treated in these detention centers. And immigrant groups are pushing for the government to fix the way these centers are being run.

This is an interview with
Jacqueline Stevens who wrote "America's Secret Ice Castles" for the Nation magazine. In this interview on Democracy Now! Stevens talks about her investigation of these ICE sponsored detention centers.








MIDTERM REFLECTIONS - We're Halfway There

1. After studying media for eight weeks in this class, what you learned? Please be specific.
During this class I have learned to be more aware of the media around me, and why it is effective at relaying its message to the audience. After being in this class and dissecting different media texts I am looking at all the media around me differently.


2. What is the most important thing you have learned about yourself as a critical reader, a writer, and a thinker in this class so far?
I have learned that reading and writing critically is not as hard as everyone around me makes it out to be. I get frustrated with my peers when they complain about having to read a text and then heaven forbid write about it. That is what school is for, and you should be thinking critically about everything you read and writing is a tool you can use to express your thoughts and opinions about something you have read. I have learned that even though I may not be personally interested in a specific text I can still have strong opinions about the information provided and have an interesting conversation with someone about the text. I have also learned that in terms of thinking critically repetition is very useful for me as a learning tool.


3. What’s one think you would do differently this first half of the semester if you were to take this class again?
One thing I would do differently if I were to take this class again would be to study the power tools more at the beginning of the semester and memorize them at the beginning of the semester. I feel like knowing them by heart after the first couple weeks of the class would have helped me use them more effectively later on in the class. Even though I know the power tools well at this point in the semester I could not just list them off for you.


4. What’s one thing you would like me to do differently this first half of the semester if you were to take this class again?

If possible it would be nice to spend a little more time talking about the texts that we read, sooner after we are finished reading them. That way it is easier to build on the previous text with a new text and we are not jumping around so much.

5. Please comment on the usefulness of the power tools, our quizzes, the course blog, your personal blog, our films, and our books as learning tools.

Power Tools: I think that the Power Tools are very useful, which is a good thing since they are the foundation of the class. Having all of the concepts and ideas that the class is about laid out in this way is very helpful to me since I am a linear thinking person and like to have everything in one place laid out in a way that makes sense. I think that boiling these concepts about media down into one or two terms is also very helpful and makes it easier to talk about and dissect media.

Quizzes: I think the quizzes are a useful part of the class because they give you an extra reason to really read the texts carefully and think about what the message is. Even if the quizzes are really short they are still useful and a good motivator.

The course blog: I love having the course blog. It is great to have our assignments all laid out and explained in depth on line where they can be accessed at any time. It is very helpful in case I forget to write something down to be able to go to the course blog and figure out what the assignment is. I also like to hear what other people have to say about the text that was assigned because sometimes when I get stuck it helps to generate some ideas or clarify what the text was trying to say. I also like to find out where people stand on a certain issue regarding a text and the blog is a good way to communicate with other class members.

Personal blog: At first I wasn’t sure if I was going to like having to keep a personal blog, but I have found it to be fun and entertaining and a good way to make the media and concepts we talk about in class personal. It is always easier for me to understand material when I can work with it and relate it to my personal life, which is what the personal blog helps me do. It is also a good place to express opinions about everything!

Films: I think the films have been very helpful in helping to dissect media, and to learn what to look for and applying our power tools to media.

Books: The books, like the films have also been helpful in learning how to dissect media and understand how the media is affecting us. I like how the texts build on each other and help me as a reader to develop more advanced and refined opinions about the media and its effect on me, and those around me. I also like how we have read some texts with opposing opinions and we were able to compare and contrast the different texts and their different opinions.

Friday, October 15, 2010

24 and Lost had a baby....and they called it The Event - Media Meditation #3

This spring I said good bye to the world saving ways of Jack Bauer and 24, as he finally took his last stand against a group of terrorists from I don't remember where and the bureaucrats of the United States government.

"Chloe it's Jack" Photo: http://www.rca.org/page.aspx?pid=3002

While I was wondering what life would be like post-Jack the other half of TV Land was getting un-lost with the series finale of the hit TV show "Lost".


Lost Photo:http://www.blurtit.com/groups/Lost

I never really got into Lost, like I did with 24. The science fiction thing was too much for me to handle at the time. I preferred the shoot em up, steal the SUV style of Jack. Feeling a little lost in TV Land without my favorite show to look forward to every Monday night (which usually come along with a home cooked meal from mom) I took a chance on a new show. I am usually a little apprehensive before getting into a new show. However I am now hooked on The Event.






The Event has it all. Aliens, time warps, Secret Service, CIA Aliens, fire fights, car chases, sleezey politicians and government operatives. It is a combination of Lost and 24 and is addicting. I am not necessarily saying that I think it is a well produced, well written show, but it is just so weird you have to know what is going to happen next. Each of the the four episodes so far has left the viewer saying "WHAT? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING TO HAPPEN?" Okay so maybe not all viewers but certainly me and my roommate.


My Event obsessed Roommate and I. Photo Cred: Dan Dubenetsky


I started to watch The Event a couple days after watching the film "Reed Bad Arabs" in class.



Short introduction to the film "Reel Bad Arabs"

This film, based on the book "Reel Bad Arabs" by Dr. Jack Shaheen discusses how Hollywood and the media can easily vilify and create a negative stereotype about an entire race of people. In the show 24 the villains were generally of a different race, either Arab, Mexican, Russian, or another race that was easy to believe would want to attack the United States. Then Jack Bauer would come in and save the day by defeating the terrorist and everyone would be fine.
In this new show The Event the "bad guys" are not even from this planet. They are extra-terrestrial beings that look and act like humans except that they age at a much slower rate then humans. The United States government has locked up the beings that they have found and are now dealing with their anger at being locked away like animals for over sixty years.

I found it interesting that this new show is not using an already established stereotype to create a villain but is using aliens from outer space. Is this the future of television and movies? Are we going to move away from vilifying the people we share this world with and start to build stereotypes about beings who might be out there somewhere in outer space? (insert twilight zone theme song here).

Monday, October 4, 2010

Camp Champ Radio Spot: Team Poof Pushes Feed




Script:
Alex: Sup meg brag units? Do you hate thinking? Making decisions?
Jon: School to boring?
Kate: what are we going to eat?
Casey: What do I wear?
Kate: Where am I?
Casey: Whats happening?
Alex: Then you need FEED (echo in feed)
Jon: Know everything in a minute
Alex: Even God has FEED
Matt: Hey guys, its me God! Feed is the coolest thing around since original sin! I'm God! I would know!
Alex: Here are some testimonials!
Casey: This is Winona Ryder and life is so much more fun when you buy things. Feed gets me what I want when I want it. No more shoplifting for me!
Kate: I’m Paris Hilton and Feed makes my life so great. Feed’s hot, and if you don’t have one you are just so lame.
Jon: I’m Michael Vick and my feed is so brag. Get your head in the game with feed. Its sick.
Feed is here to stay. You have to get one. Imagine being like left out while your friends all like jam out to their feeds and have like the best time ever.
Yea didn’t think you’d like that one.
Join the real world, get a FEED (echo out).

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Justin Bieber Makes U Smile - Media Meditation #2

While combing through my new Google Reader (if you don't have one I suggest you get one) I came across an article about Justin Bieber's new music video premier for his song "U Smile".

I want to clarify that I am in no way shape or form a Justin Bieber fan, but am curious as to why every preteen girl is swooning over this dorky little kid. After all I used to be a swooney preteen girl but I was unhealthily obsessed with the pierced tattooed guys from Blink 182.
Justin Bieber Photo: http://www.justjustinbieber.info/

I pushed my opinions aside and read the article "Justin Bieber's New Music Video "U Smile" Premiers Thursday on E!"


I learned that Bieber fans have entitled themselves Beleibers...I don't get it, but good for them. The premise of the article was to announce that Justin Bieber would be premiering his new music video on Thursday on E!News and and E!Online. I know, it really sucks that we all have to wait until tomorrow to see this cinematic event. Bieber announced the premier via Twitter (obviously) stating "I took the opportunity 2 make a video 4 the fans about a fan and how we could fall IN LOVE. Love grows". (insert gagging noise here).

Here is a video (not the official music video) of Justin Bieber singing "U Smile" on American Idol. Just in case you are curious.




As much as I think Justin Bieber is a joke...the kid knows what he's doing...or he at least has a manager who knows what they are doing. I can't think of a better way to strengthen your fan base of pre-teen girls then to tell them they have the possibility of falling in love with you. Girls are going to be swooping up his CD's, concert tickets, and merchandise hoping for a chance to meet the pre-pubescent heart throb because they might fall in love. Hopefully they have better luck then I had in my middle school relationships.

Here is a clip of Bieber on Chelsea Lately


Teenage pop stars understand the concept of convergence more than anyone else in the media world. They use myspace, Tweet, Facebook, Music, Video, TV interviews, movies, television sitcoms, blogs and wrap them into one big media package that they use to build a very large and loyal fan base. We can laugh at these teeneybopper acts all we want (and I will continue to) but they are making more money then we can ever dream of because they understand how our new media world works.

Friday, September 24, 2010

52 TV's and Loads of Wings - Media Meditation #1

In order to pay rent and to live the full "college experience" in Burlington for my senior year at Champlain I had to go out and get a job. After combing Craig's List and dropping off job applications I finally got a job at Buffalo Wild Wings. Buffalo Wild Wings (BWW) is about three things, wings, beer, and sports. Here is a TV commercial for BWW that gives a pretty good idea of the atmosphere and what the average customer base is like.




As a host at BWW it is my job to greet and seat customers. This has proven to be a difficult task. When customers walk in they are immediately distracted by the 52 televisions that cover almost every wall in the restaurant, including eight gigantic large screen TV's. Kids walk in and are immediately mesmerized. I watch their eyes glaze over as they stare at the amazing number of screens surrounding them. I have never seen kids behave so well in a restaurant either. They are so distracted by the different screens they don't even want to misbehave for their parents.




It is a little mind numbing to be surrounded by that many televisions, especially when you are working for 6 or 7 hours at a time, as it is a constant over stimulation. Sundays are the most interesting days for me to work. Since the start of the NFL regular season Sundays have been hectic. People come in to watch the games, eat wings, and drink beer. Their experience at the restaurant is totally dependent on what TV the game they want to watch is playing on. People wait up to forty five minutes for a table near a TV that is playing their preferred game.

Buffalo Wild Wings, Burlington Vermont http://www.findandgoseek.net/listing/buffalo-wild-wings-grill-and-bar/dads-night-out-with-kids


It is amazing how excited people get about watching sports on TV. For me, watching sports on TV is always kind of a background thing while talking with friends or working around the house. I don't generally devote all my attention to a sporting event on TV unless it is a championship of some sort. For me it is more exciting to actually attend a sporting event live and in person. I am constantly amazed at how riveted to the TV these sports fans are on game day and how for some Sunday Football is the main event of the day. Before Television sporting events were a chance for people to gather together and support their team. But now Television has changed the world of sports and how sports fans can cheer on and support their teams.



I think that Neil Postman would agree with this statement, and I feel that it fits in well with his thesis about how Television has changed our society and the way it works. Instead of being a typographic society we have shifted to an image based society.